See, this whole view of male-female relations really skeeves me off. And it's not because I feel a need to defend myself for my own behavior or anything: as many of the people on my friends list know, I'm not exactly running around having nude parties or anything. But I think this view does a grave disservice to both men and women, and is deeply insulting.
First, because it's more relevant to my experience, the view this engenders of women is...abhorrent to say the least. It places all responsibility for sexual fidelity or control on the woman's part, while ensuring that she has to play the 'courting game' in order to get what she wants. She is not permitted to simply enjoy being with a member of the opposite sex; instead, she's expected to always have to be on the lookout, protecting her 'modesty' and 'virtue' from sneaky men trying to get for free what they should be 'paying' for. And never mind, for the moment, the assumption that makes all sexual relationships between people into whoredom, sex for security. Or the idea that the only reason you would want to spend your life with someone is for security or for the easy availability of sex. (The author claims to be a romantic. He's not. His view of relationships is, as far as I can tell, cold and greedy, with both participants using underhanded tricks to try and get either a wedding ring or sex from the other.) But nevermind that. Instead, let's look at the idea that a woman's greatest value is in her modesty and virtue. In other words, her ability to withhold from men what they want until they give her what she (presumably) wants: marriage and a baby. What kind of twisted shit is that, anyway? Are we, as women, supposed to take pride in that kind of role? Moreover, in the author's view, courtship lies in her teasing the man with what she has, that he wants, but denying it to him until he comes up with the right payment. Essentially, successful women in this paradigm are those who can display themselves to arouse, and then lie about doing so (modesty!) and trick a man into a relationship that, apparently, he only wants because he's desperate for the sex. You want to know why the common negative stereotype of femininity is deceptive, clingy, and 'cockteasing'? Because in the worldview that people such as this author admire, that's the way things are SUPPOSED to be. And, of course, a woman cannot know her own sexual desires, or act on them, because then her value as a sexual partner immediately drops, and men will only see her as worth 'fooling around' and not worth marrying. And that's the way it's supposed to be, of course, because it's the woman's job to preserve her virtue. If she doesn't, then she's not a woman worth respecting.
Now, look at what this says about the men, too. Men are not expected to have self-control. In fact, it's rather heavily implied that they are incapable of it. Moreover, the only reason they have any desire to be around women is to get into their pants. And once having had sex with a woman, if they are not entrapped by a wedding ring, they will immediately leave to find another. Forget things like friendship, enjoyment of another's company, or shared interests; a man doesn't care about anything regarding a woman except what he can get from her body. Unless, of course, she is a virtuous woman who denies him for so long that the base lust he feels turns to love. (How does that work, anyway? Is there a time table, or what?) Then, of course, he'll marry her. He'll probably still go out and have sex on the side, though. He can't help himself. Besides, it's okay! Everyone knows that you distinguish between the sluts and your wife. Now, I don't know about you, but I'm looking at that description, and thinking, "If men were /really/ like that, then I'd just be looking forward to a long life of celibacy." Really, who would want to be around someone like that, whether they were male or female, much less enshrine this view of masculinity as the ideal? What. The. Hell.
I like to be a charitable person. And so, I am forced to conclude that Mr. Kass and people like him look back in the past, and they see the pretty, formal manners, and the balls, and the stories, and go, "Aw, how sweet". And just never think about the underlying dynamics of what it means for people trying to get along with one another and, god forbid, find someone to love who loves them.
Also, speaking as a student in college? Yes, people still date. People still 'go steady'. People still fall in love, get married, and have children. Marriage is not dead, neither is love, or romance.